nike free 5.0 v3 review,nike free mens 14

The trial level oversight trial supervision resolved, the judge handling the case whether the inappropriate behavior, by specific case (incident) cases evaluation mechanisms to resolve. Hengqin Court also emphasized that in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the judge, let the judges get a fair evaluation, 'opinions' to make the following arrangements: first, there are two fundamental principles of security, are not to interfere with the principle of independent trials, a comprehensive evaluation principles. Second, the evaluation of the body have the right to the corresponding requirements. Evaluation committee to have deputies or CPPCC members, the People's Court who monitors these high participation of public trust, and members shall withdraw. Third, set up three specific rule, namely, 1. Specific examples of the rules by the judge to avoid unfounded accusations; 2. Peer professional evaluation rules to avoid lay comment inline; 3. Conclusion no rating rules to prevent the reputation of competent judges damaged, avoid public fight contacts evaluate become sea draft. Hengqin court presentation, then, will be completed as soon as possible, 'the judge annual assessment methods', 'the judge evaluation approach' draft, the direction of reform and innovation initiatives 'Opinions' of the letter. Pre-reform judges assessment indicators: Simplified clearance rate, mediation rate, withdrawal rate, the number of investigators to quantitative assessment based annual assessment after the reform, the abolition of unnecessary and contrary to the law of the trial assessment project. Such as the introduction of divisional balance, the number of investigators simplified assessment to see whether the judges judge the timely completion of the tasks identified in the meeting. Secondly, some of the performance is adjusted to a longer period to examine. Such as the ability to do mass work (the original measure with the mediation rate, withdrawal rate, etc.) the ability to implement multi-year assessment, included in the comprehensive evaluation. First, a comprehensive evaluation Evaluation type, the second is a specific case (incident) cases evaluation. The introduction of third-party evaluation of the main evaluation. Evaluation team of five members composed of judges, lawyers, law, or NPC deputies and CPPCC members, the people's court of special supervisors. Evaluation project covers diligent, ability and quality, ethics and judicial experience in four areas. Evaluation purpose is not appraised, but 'poor assessment.' Not as early as possible so that any exposure, and allowed to exit the Judges, to prevent a mouse droppings, broken pot